Skip to content
FIRE Calculator Pro

Comparison

A Networthify alternative that tests your early retirement date

Networthify's “When can I retire?” calculator turns your savings rate into years until retirement, using one steady return. FIRE Calculator Pro gives the same savings-rate answer, then adds Social Security, fees and a test of the plan against every market since 1928.

Last checked By Kashif Nazir Khan

The short answer

  • Networthify is a single, focused calculator: income, savings and expenses in, years to retirement out, with a 5% return after taxes and inflation and a 4% withdrawal rate by default[1].
  • Its default example, saving $30,000 of $50,000, shows 12.4 years[1]. Our engine gives 12.4 years for the same inputs, so the core math matches.
  • Networthify assumes the principal is never drawn down[1]. Replaying every 52-year retirement since 1928, that same $500,000 lasted in 77% of start years in our historical test.
  • Use Networthify for a fast, motivating savings-rate number. Use our calculators when you want Social Security, a longer horizon or the odds of success in your answer.
On this page
  1. 01What is Networthify?
  2. 02Side-by-side comparison
  3. 03The same plan in both tools
  4. 04What the fixed return hides
  5. 05How do you check a Networthify result here?
  6. 06When should you use Networthify instead?
  7. 07When should you use FIRE Calculator Pro?

What is Networthify?

Networthify is a small site built around one question: when can I retire? Its main calculator asks for your after-tax income, how much you save, your expenses, your savings rate and what you have invested, with more options for the annual return and the withdrawal rate[1]. It answers with the number of years until you can retire, your goal net worth and a chart of how the answer changes at other savings rates. A year-by-year breakdown and a share button sit under the result.

The site's message is that your savings rate matters more than your income. A companion page shows two people who each save 50% of their pay, one earning $50,000 and one earning $200,000, retiring in the same 16.6 years, because the higher earner also needs a portfolio four times as large[2]. It is a clear, memorable way to show the idea, and it is why so many people search for the calculator by name.

Networthify is upfront about its simplifications. Under “Show assumptions” it lists four: your expenses now equal your expenses in retirement, you will never draw down the principal, income is after tax, and the return is after taxes and inflation[1]. Those assumptions are what keep it to a handful of inputs.

Around the calculator, the site adds context rather than more modeling. The result compares your savings rate with average household saving rates in several countries, from OECD figures, and the menu links to a page on how much people save by country and to a calculator for what recurring subscriptions really cost[1]. Everything points back to the same lesson: spend less, save the difference, and the date moves closer.

How do Networthify and FIRE Calculator Pro compare?

Networthify compared with FIRE Calculator Pro
FeatureNetworthifyFIRE Calculator Pro
Main questionYears until you can retire, from your savings rate[1]FIRE number, FI age and odds of success, plus Coast, Barista, Lean and Fat FIRE
InputsAfter-tax income, savings, expenses, savings rate, portfolio, return, withdrawal rate[1]Age, pay, spending, savings, retirement spending, return, inflation, fees, stock mix, plan-until age
Default return5% after taxes and inflation[1]7% nominal, 3% inflation, 0.1% fees (3.79% real)
Retirement spendingAssumed equal to today's expenses[1]Can differ from today's spending
Drawing down savingsAssumes the principal is never drawn down[1]Models withdrawals to your plan-until age
Social Security or pensionNo separate input[1]Optional inputs with start ages
Risk testsOne fixed return[1]2,000-run Monte Carlo and every historical start year since 1928
Account neededNo; the calculator runs on the page[1]No

Networthify details checked on its own pages in November 2026. FIRE Calculator Pro details are from our methodology page.

Do the two tools give the same answer?

On the core calculation, yes. The savings-rate method is simple: each year you add your savings to a portfolio that grows at a fixed real return, and you are done when the portfolio reaches your spending divided by the withdrawal rate. Networthify's default example saves $30,000 of a $50,000 after-tax income, a 60% savings rate, and shows 12.4 years to a goal of $500,000[1]. Our engine, given the same 5% real return and 4% withdrawal rate, gives 12.4 years.

The assumption that moves the answer most is the return. Networthify's 5% is after taxes and inflation. Our calculators default to 7% growth, 3% inflation and 0.1% fees, which comes to 3.79% after inflation. The table shows years to FI at several savings rates under each, plus a more cautious 3.5% withdrawal rate.

Years to financial independence by savings rate, starting from zero
Savings rate5% real, 4% withdrawal3.79% real, 4%5% real, 3.5%
10%51.3 years60.6 years53.9 years
25%31.9 years36.2 years34.1 years
50%16.6 years17.9 years18.2 years
60%12.4 years13.2 years13.7 years
75%7.1 years7.4 years8 years

Our calculation with the FIRE Calculator Pro engine, starting from a $0 portfolio, with spending equal to income minus savings.

At high savings rates the return barely matters: at 75% the gap is 0.2 years. At low savings rates it matters a great deal, because most of the final portfolio comes from growth rather than from what you put in. The withdrawal rate works the other way: moving from 4% to 3.5% raises the goal by a seventh, which adds 1.3 years at a 60% savings rate.

Why the savings rate carries so much weight

The savings rate works on both sides of the equation at once. Every dollar you save is a dollar added to the portfolio and a dollar you have shown you can live without, which lowers the goal. That is why, with a starting balance of zero, income drops out of the answer. In our engine a 50% savings rate at 5% real and a 4% withdrawal rate takes 16.6 years whether you earn $50,000 or $200,000, the same result Networthify shows on its income comparison page[2].

Savings you already have break that symmetry. They are measured against your spending, so a head start counts for more on a lower budget. Starting the default example with $50,000 already invested, one year of take-home pay, the time to FI at a 60% savings rate falls from 12.4 years to 10.8 years in our engine. Networthify has a portfolio value field for exactly this[1].

What happens once you start withdrawing?

Networthify's assumption that you never draw down the principal[1] follows from its inputs. If the portfolio earns a steady 5% after inflation and you withdraw 4%, it grows every year on paper. Real markets do not deliver 5% every year, and a bad decade early in retirement can do lasting damage even if the long-run average is fine[6].

So we took the default plan one step further. Saving $30,000 a year from age 30 at 5% reaches the goal at 43 in our engine. We then retired the plan at 43 with exactly the goal, spending $20,000 a year in today's dollars until 95, a 52-year retirement, and tested it two ways: a replay of every historical start year with a full 52-year record, and 2,000 Monte Carlo runs.

Success rates for a 52-year retirement spending $20,000 a year
Portfolio at 43HistoricalMonte CarloMonte Carlo, 5% matched
$500,000 at 4% (Networthify's goal)77%78%66%
$571,429 at 3.5%94%86%76%
$500,000 at 4%, plus $15,000/yr Social Security from 6796%91%85%

Our calculation: 80% stocks and 20% bonds, 0.1% fees, US data 1928-2025[3]. Historical: 47 start years. Monte Carlo: 2,000 runs, seed 2026, replaying history or shifted so its average real return is 5%.

The two tests answer slightly different questions. The historical replay asks what would have happened to someone who retired in each past year, with markets arriving in their real order. The Monte Carlo run builds 2,000 new sequences by drawing those same years at random, and the matched version first shifts every year so the long-run average equals the 5% you assumed, which keeps the comparison with Networthify fair.

A 4% withdrawal rate held up in about 77% of historical start years over 52 years. The worst start, 1966, ran out of money after 25 years. That is in line with research showing that 4% was built for 30-year retirements[4] and that longer early retirements call for something closer to 3.25%-3.5%[5]. At 3.5% the same plan held up in 94% of start years, at the cost of 1.3 years more saving.

Social Security changes the picture again. A $15,000 benefit from 67 means the portfolio only has to cover $5,000 a year from then on. In our engine that lowers the amount needed at 43 to $376,340 and brings the FI age to 41. Kept at $500,000, the plan with the benefit held up in 96% of historical start years. Your own estimate is available from the Social Security Administration[7].

How do you check a Networthify result here?

If you have a Networthify answer, you can re-create it in our FIRE calculator and then add what it leaves out. The fields line up like this:

  • After-tax income and expenses. Enter them as take-home pay and spending per year. The calculator shows the savings rate they imply, so you can check it matches.
  • Portfolio value. Enter it as what you have invested today.
  • Return. Networthify asks for a return after inflation[1], while we ask for a nominal return, inflation and fees separately. To reproduce its 5%, enter 8.15% growth with 3% inflation and no fees. Then try our defaults to see how sensitive your date is.
  • Withdrawal rate. Use the same rate. Then set the age your money must last until; for an early retirement, 95 means a horizon of 50 years or more.
  • What Networthify does not ask. Add your Social Security estimate and claiming age, and switch on a different retirement budget if your spending will change, for example after the mortgage is paid off.

With those inputs our deterministic answer should land within a year of Networthify's, because the timing conventions differ slightly. The new information is below the result: a Monte Carlo success rate, the share of historical start years that worked, and the worst ones.

When should you use Networthify instead?

  • You want one number fast. Five inputs and one button, with the answer and a savings-rate chart on the same screen[1].
  • You are deciding how much to save. Clicking the chart to try other savings rates is a quick way to feel the trade-off.
  • You are explaining FIRE to someone. The income comparison page makes the savings-rate idea easy to grasp[2].

When should you use FIRE Calculator Pro?

  • Your retirement spending will differ from today's. Enter them separately, for example once the mortgage is paid off.
  • You expect Social Security or a pension. Income that starts later lowers your target from the age it begins.
  • Your retirement could last 40 years or more. Set the age the money must last to and see how often your withdrawal rate held up.
  • You want to stress-test the plan. Every FIRE calculator shows a Monte Carlo success rate and the worst historical start years, and you can switch the tests to match your own return assumption.
  • You want to go further. Coast, Barista, Lean and Fat FIRE calculators use the same engine, so the answers are consistent.

A good way to use both: find your savings-rate answer on Networthify, then put the same numbers into our FIRE calculator and see how much margin the plan has. The formulas are documented on the methodology page.

Frequently asked questions

Is Networthify's early retirement calculator accurate?

Its math is consistent with the standard savings-rate method: on its default inputs it shows 12.4 years[1], and our engine gives 12.4 years. What it cannot tell you is how a plan holds up when returns are uneven, because it uses one fixed return and assumes you never draw down the principal[1].

What return does Networthify assume?

5% a year by default, which it describes as the return after taxes and inflation. You can change it, along with the 4% withdrawal rate, under “more options”[1].

Does Networthify include Social Security?

Its inputs are after-tax income, savings, expenses, savings rate, portfolio value, return and withdrawal rate[1], so there is no separate field for Social Security or a pension. It also assumes your expenses in retirement equal your expenses now[1]. Our FIRE calculator lets you add both with their own start ages.

Is FIRE Calculator Pro free?

Yes. There is no account, no email sign-up and no ads, and your inputs never leave your browser. See the privacy policy.

Sources

Figures checked against each source on November 11, 2026.

  1. [1]When can I retire? · Networthify, Checked November 2026.Inputs: after-tax income, savings, expenses, savings rate and portfolio value, with more options for annual return (default 5%, after taxes and inflation) and withdrawal rate (default 4%). Stated assumptions: expenses now equal expenses in retirement, the principal is never drawn down. Default inputs ($50,000 income, $30,000 savings) show 12.4 years and a $500,000 goal. The result compares your rate with OECD household saving rates, and the site menu also links to a subscriptions cost calculator and a savings-rate-by-country page.
  2. [2]Do I need a high income to retire early? · Networthify, Checked November 2026.Explains that time to retirement depends on savings rate rather than income: two people saving 50% of $50,000 and $200,000 both retire in 16.6 years.
  3. [3]Historical Returns on Stocks, Bonds and Bills: 1928-2025 · Aswath Damodaran, NYU Stern School of Business, Updated January 5, 2026.Annual S&P 500, 10-year Treasury and CPI data used by our Monte Carlo and historical backtests (S&P 500: 10.02% a year nominal, 1928-2025).
  4. [4]Determining Withdrawal Rates Using Historical Data · William P. Bengen, Journal of Financial Planning, October 1994.Origin of the 4% rule: a 4% inflation-adjusted first-year withdrawal lasted at least 33 years in every historical period tested. Used Ibbotson's 1992 SBBI data from 1926 on, illustrated with 50% common stocks and 50% intermediate-term Treasuries; a 4% first-year withdrawal, raised for inflation, never exhausted a portfolio before 33 years, while 4.25% could fail in 28 years; 3% (and about 3.5%) never lasted less than 50 years; 5% is 'risky' and 6% or more is 'gambling'; recommended 50%-75% stocks; assumed tax-deferred accounts; a 1929 retiree who cut withdrawals 5% had 20% more wealth by 1949.
  5. [5]The Safe Withdrawal Rate Series · Karsten Jeske, Early Retirement Now, 2016-2025.The series models very long early retirements ("a 50 or even 60-year horizon"); withdrawal rates of 3.25-3.50% would have survived even the most catastrophic historical market conditions, and Part 3 argues about 3.25% is needed for low failure risk over 60 years when valuations are high.
  6. [6]Understanding sequence of return risk and safe withdrawal rates · Michael Kitces, Kitces.com, October 1, 2014.Real returns in the first decade of retirement largely determine the safe withdrawal rate (correlation about 0.79).
  7. [7]Benefit calculators and my Social Security · Social Security Administration, Ongoing.Where to get your personal benefit estimate to enter in our calculators.