Skip to content
FIRE Calculator Pro

Guide

FIRE Statistics: Withdrawal Rates, Savings and Backtests

Original backtests of every US retirement that started from 1928 on, plus the official numbers on what Americans save and spend. Market data through 2025; figures recomputed on every site build.

Updated 9 min readBy Kashif Nazir Khan

Key takeaways

  • A 4% withdrawal rate with 75% stocks lasted 30 years in 94% of US start years since 1928 and 60 years in 82% (our backtest).
  • The highest rate that never ran out with 75% stocks was 3.80% over 30 years and 3.30% over 60 years.
  • Failures cluster: every failed 30-year retirement at 4% (75/25) started in 1965, 1966, 1968 and 1969.
  • At a 50% savings rate and the 5.8% real return of a 75/25 portfolio since 1928, reaching financial independence from zero takes about 15.9 years.
  • 54.9% of US families had a retirement account in 2025, with a median balance of $106,000[9]: enough for about $4,240 a year at 4%.
On this page
  1. 01Key FIRE statistics at a glance
  2. 02How often does each withdrawal rate survive?
  3. 03What is the highest withdrawal rate that never failed?
  4. 04Which retirement start years were the worst?
  5. 05How much money is left at the end?
  6. 06How much do flexible withdrawals help?
  7. 07How long does it take to reach financial independence?
  8. 08How much do Americans have saved for retirement?
  9. 09How much do retirees spend, and what FIRE number does that imply?
  10. 10What returns are these statistics built on?
  11. 11How many people pursue FIRE?
  12. 12How we calculated this

These FIRE statistics come from two places: our own replay of every US retirement since 1928, and official surveys of what American families hold and spend. The backtests use Aswath Damodaran's annual S&P 500, 10-year Treasury and inflation data for 1928-2025[1], run through the same engine as our calculators. Every number on this page is recomputed when the site is built, so it always matches the data and the tools.

Each section answers one question and stands on its own. If you quote a figure, please cite this page and the date it was updated.

Key FIRE statistics at a glance

FIRE statistics summary
FIRE statistics summary with sources
StatisticValueSource
4% rule, 30 years, 75% stocks: start years that lasted94%Our backtest
4% rule, 60 years, 75% stocks: start years that lasted82%Our backtest
Highest rate that never failed, 30 / 60 years, 75% stocks3.80% / 3.30%Our backtest
Worst 30-year start year at 4% (75% stocks)1966, ran out after 26 yearsOur backtest
Real return since 1928: stocks / 75/25 / bonds6.8% / 5.8% / 1.5%Our calculation
Years to FI from zero at a 50% savings rate (75/25 returns)15.9Our calculation
Families with a retirement account (2025)54.9%Federal Reserve SCF[9]
Median retirement account balance, holders (2025)$106,000Federal Reserve SCF[9]
Average spending, households 65+ (2025)$64,445BLS[11]
Safe 30-year starting rate, forward-looking3.9%Morningstar[5]

Backtests: original analysis by FIRE Calculator Pro of Damodaran 1928-2025 data, fixed inflation-adjusted withdrawals, no fees.

How often does each withdrawal rate survive?

A 4% withdrawal rate lasted 30 years in 94% of US start years with 75% stocks, but only 82% over 60 years. Below 3.5% almost everything survived; above 5%, failures became common at every horizon. The tables show the share of start years in which the money never ran out, with failed start years out of all tested in brackets.

Historical success rate by withdrawal rate, 75% stocks

Share of US start years since 1928 in which a fixed inflation-adjusted withdrawal lasted the full horizon. No fees.

  • 30 years
  • 40 years
  • 50 years
  • 60 years
Historical success rate by withdrawal rate and horizon: 100% stocks
Success rate, 100% stocks
Withdrawal rate30 years40 years50 years60 years
3%100% (0/69)100% (0/59)100% (0/49)100% (0/39)
3.5%99% (1/69)98% (1/59)96% (2/49)95% (2/39)
4%93% (5/69)88% (7/59)86% (7/49)90% (4/39)
4.5%90% (7/69)78% (13/59)71% (14/49)79% (8/39)
5%78% (15/69)69% (18/59)59% (20/49)64% (14/39)
5.5%74% (18/69)63% (22/59)49% (25/49)56% (17/39)
6%68% (22/69)58% (25/59)47% (26/49)54% (18/39)

Original analysis by FIRE Calculator Pro of Damodaran 1928-2025 data. Brackets: failed start years / start years tested.

Historical success rate by withdrawal rate and horizon: 75/25 stocks/bonds
Success rate, 75/25 stocks/bonds
Withdrawal rate30 years40 years50 years60 years
3%100% (0/69)100% (0/59)100% (0/49)100% (0/39)
3.5%100% (0/69)100% (0/59)98% (1/49)95% (2/39)
4%94% (4/69)90% (6/59)80% (10/49)82% (7/39)
4.5%87% (9/69)73% (16/59)63% (18/49)67% (13/39)
5%77% (16/69)63% (22/59)47% (26/49)54% (18/39)
5.5%67% (23/69)56% (26/59)37% (31/49)38% (24/39)
6%62% (26/69)46% (32/59)33% (33/49)36% (25/39)

Original analysis by FIRE Calculator Pro of Damodaran 1928-2025 data. Brackets: failed start years / start years tested.

Historical success rate by withdrawal rate and horizon: 50/50 stocks/bonds
Success rate, 50/50 stocks/bonds
Withdrawal rate30 years40 years50 years60 years
3%100% (0/69)100% (0/59)100% (0/49)100% (0/39)
3.5%100% (0/69)97% (2/59)86% (7/49)85% (6/39)
4%93% (5/69)81% (11/59)57% (21/49)54% (18/39)
4.5%83% (12/69)59% (24/59)37% (31/49)33% (26/39)
5%67% (23/69)44% (33/59)24% (37/49)18% (32/39)
5.5%57% (30/69)32% (40/59)8% (45/49)3% (38/39)
6%49% (35/69)22% (46/59)0% (49/49)0% (39/39)

Original analysis by FIRE Calculator Pro of Damodaran 1928-2025 data. Brackets: failed start years / start years tested.

Two patterns hold across the tables. Longer horizons need lower rates, and the mix matters more the longer you go: at 3.5% over 60 years, 75% stocks lasted in 95% of start years, against 85% for a 50/50 mix. The 60-year column tests fewer start years (39, 1928-1966), so a single bad decade moves it more.

What is the highest withdrawal rate that never failed?

Over 30 years, the highest starting rate that survived every US start year since 1928 was 3.80% with 75% stocks; over 60 years it was 3.30%. This is the historical "safe" withdrawal rate: the worst case in the record, found by testing every rate in 0.05% steps.

Highest withdrawal rate that lasted in every historical start year
Historical safe withdrawal rate by portfolio mix and horizon
Portfolio30 years40 years50 years60 years
100% stocks3.45%3.30%3.20%3.15%
75/25 stocks/bonds3.80%3.55%3.35%3.30%
50/50 stocks/bonds3.65%3.35%3.20%3.10%

Original analysis by FIRE Calculator Pro of Damodaran 1928-2025 data. Fixed inflation-adjusted withdrawals, annual rebalancing, no fees.

Published research lands in the same range. William Bengen found a 4% start lasted at least 33 years in every period he tested[2]. Early Retirement Now found 3.25% to 3.5% survived the worst historical conditions over 50 to 60 years[4]. Morningstar's forward-looking estimate for a 30-year retirement with a 90% chance of success is 3.9%[5]. Differences come from data sources, bond series, fees and timing conventions, so compare methods, not just headline rates.

Which retirement start years were the worst?

The worst years to retire on a 4% plan were 1965, 1966, 1968 and 1969: with 75% stocks, they are the only 30-year retirements that ran out. Over 60 years, the failures were 1929, 1930, 1937, 1962, 1964, 1965 and 1966. The table ranks the six weakest start years for each horizon, failures first.

Weakest start years at a 4% withdrawal rate, 75% stocks
Worst historical retirement start years at 4%
Rank30 years60 years
11966: ran out after 26 years1966: ran out after 26 years
21969: ran out after 27 years1965: ran out after 29 years
31968: ran out after 28 years1929: ran out after 38 years
41965: ran out after 29 years1962: ran out after 40 years
51964: lasted, $263K left1964: ran out after 40 years
61929: lasted, $276K left1937: ran out after 44 years

Original analysis by FIRE Calculator Pro. Ending balances are per $1 million at the start, in today's dollars.

Bad start years come in clusters because returns in the first decade of retirement largely set how much you can safely spend[8]. A 75/25 portfolio returned -1.9% a year after inflation over the ten years from 1966, and 2.7% from 1929, against a median ten-year real return of 6.1% across all start years (our calculation). A plan that survives these start years has survived the worst the US record contains.

How much money is left at the end?

Usually a lot. At 4% with 75% stocks, the median 30-year retirement ended with $2.41M in today's dollars per $1M at the start. That is the other side of planning for the worst case: in most start years, the money grew while it was being spent.

Median real ending balance per $1 million, 75% stocks
Median ending balance by withdrawal rate and horizon
Withdrawal rate30 years40 years50 years60 years
3%$3.03M$3.87M$5.3M$12.99M
3.5%$2.71M$3.06M$3.8M$9.56M
4%$2.41M$2.24M$2.41M$6.78M
4.5%$1.98M$1.68M$973K$4.12M
5%$1.56M$1.12M$0$1.45M
5.5%$1.17M$361K$0$0
6%$860K$0$0$0

Original analysis by FIRE Calculator Pro. Median across start years, today's dollars; $0 means the median retirement ran out. The 60-year column covers only start years 1928-1966, which is why it can exceed the 50-year one.

The spread is wide. At 4% over 30 years, the weakest tenth of start years ended with $282K or less, while the median ended with $2.41M. A fixed withdrawal plan sized for the worst decade leaves most retirees with more than they started with.

How much do flexible withdrawals help?

A lot on survival, at the cost of spending cuts. At a 5% start with 75% stocks, fixed withdrawals lasted 30 years in 77% of start years; Guyton-Klinger guardrails lasted in 100%. Guardrails cut withdrawals by 10% when the withdrawal rate drifts 20% above its start and raise them 10% when it drifts 20% below[7].

Fixed withdrawals vs guardrails, 75% stocks
Historical success and spending cuts, fixed withdrawals vs guardrails
Start rate, horizonFixed lastedGuardrails lastedStart years with a cutTypical lowest spendingWorst lowest spending
5%, 30 years77%100%42%84%38% (1966)
4.5%, 40 years73%100%64%77%42% (1965)
4%, 50 years80%100%84%73%47% (1965)

Original analysis by FIRE Calculator Pro. Lowest spending is the lowest yearly withdrawal as a share of the first year's, in today's dollars.

Morningstar reached a similar conclusion with forward-looking assumptions: guardrails supported a 5.2% starting rate on a 40/60 portfolio against 3.9% for fixed withdrawals, with much more variable income[6]. The worst historical case still meant living on 38% of the starting withdrawal for a 1966 retiree. Morningstar found that counting Social Security roughly halved the swings in total income[6], so guardrails are easier to live with when a guaranteed benefit covers the essentials.

How long does it take to reach financial independence?

At a 50% savings rate, about 15.9 years from zero; at 25%, about 29.6 years; at 10%, about 46.7. Your savings rate drives the timeline because it sets both how fast you save and how much you need: spending less shrinks the FIRE number too.

Years to financial independence by savings rate

From zero savings, retiring at 25 times spending (4%), at the real returns of each mix since 1928.

  • 100% stocks (6.8% real)
  • 75/25 (5.8% real)
  • 50/50 (4.6% real)
Years to financial independence by savings rate
Years to financial independence by savings rate and real return
Savings rate100% stocks (6.8%)75/25 (5.8%)50/50 (4.6%)
10%42.546.753.8
15%36.039.244.7
20%31.333.938.2
25%27.529.633.1
30%24.426.128.9
40%19.320.422.2
50%15.115.917.0
60%11.512.012.6
70%8.38.68.9

Our calculation. Savings rate is the share of take-home pay invested; the rest is spending, which continues in retirement. Constant real returns.

These are smooth-return estimates; real markets make the date earlier or later. The FIRE calculator runs your own numbers, including a starting balance and Monte Carlo odds.

How much do Americans have saved for retirement?

54.9% of US families held a retirement account in 2025. Among them, the median balance was $106,000 and the mean was $451,100[9]. At a 4% withdrawal rate, the median balance supports about $4,240 a year (our calculation), far below what most households spend.

Retirement savings and net worth by age, 2025
Mean retirement account balance and median net worth by age of family head, 2025
Age of family headMean IRA/DC balance (holders)Median net worth
Under 35$48,400$33,000
35-44$182,400$155,600
45-54$415,800$253,700
55-64$670,200$411,900
65-74Not reported$431,300
75 or olderNot reported$504,900

Federal Reserve, Survey of Consumer Finances 2025 (Table 2 and Box 2 Table A).

The survey reports mean retirement balances only up to age 64, the working-age families it studies for plan participation; 65.1% of those families took part in a retirement plan in 2025[9]. Means sit well above medians because a minority of large balances pull them up, so the median is the better guide to a typical household.

How much do retirees spend, and what FIRE number does that imply?

US households spent $81,905 on average in 2025, and households headed by someone 65 or older spent $64,445[11]. Using the 25x rule, that is a FIRE number of $2,047,625 for the average household and $1,611,125 for the average older household (our calculation).

FIRE number implied by average US spending, 2025
FIRE number at 4% and 3.5% for average US household spending
HouseholdYearly spendingFIRE number at 4%FIRE number at 3.5%
All households$81,905$2,047,625$2,340,143
Head aged 65+$64,445$1,611,125$1,841,286

Spending from BLS Consumer Expenditures 2025. FIRE number = spending ÷ withdrawal rate (our calculation).

Social Security and pensions lower the number a portfolio must cover, which is why our FIRE number calculator subtracts them year by year. See how to calculate your FIRE number for the method.

What returns are these statistics built on?

From 1928 to 2025, US stocks returned 6.78% a year after inflation and 10-year Treasuries 1.45% (our calculation). In nominal terms the S&P 500 returned 10.02% a year[1].

Real returns by portfolio mix, 1928-2025
Compound real return and worst year by portfolio mix
PortfolioReal return a yearWorst year
100% stocks6.78%-38.1% (1931)
75/25 stocks/bonds5.84%-28.2% (1937)
50/50 stocks/bonds4.64%-22.9% (2022)
100% bonds1.45%-22.8% (2022)

Our calculation from Damodaran data. Annually rebalanced, no fees, 98 years.

How many people pursue FIRE?

We have not found a government or academic survey that measures how many people pursue financial independence or early retirement, so we do not publish an estimate. The savings and spending data above, from the Federal Reserve and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, are the closest reliable benchmarks.

How we calculated this

  • Data: Damodaran's annual returns, 1928-2025 (98 years, updated January 5, 2026)[1]: S&P 500 total return for stocks, 10-year US Treasury total return for bonds, December-to-December CPI-U for inflation.
  • Withdrawals: the stated rate of the starting balance in year one, then the same inflation-adjusted amount at the start of every year. Portfolios are rebalanced to their mix annually. No fees, taxes, Social Security or return adjustments.
  • Start years: every year with a complete history for the horizon: 69 for 30 years, 59 for 40, 49 for 50 and 39 for 60. Overlapping periods share years, so they are not independent trials.
  • Success: every year's withdrawal was paid in full. Ending balances are real (today's dollars) per $1,000,000 at the start.
  • Guardrails: Guyton-Klinger rules as described by Kitces[7], applied the same way as in our savings calculator.
  • Years to FI: from zero, saving a fixed share of take-home pay at a constant real return, until the balance reaches 25 times the remaining spending.
  • Official data: quoted as published by the Federal Reserve[9] and the BLS[10]. These are US figures only.

Updated November 11, 2026. Suggested citation: FIRE Calculator Pro, "FIRE Statistics: Withdrawal Rates, Savings and Backtests", November 11, 2026, firecalculatorpro.com/guides/fire-statistics. Full formulas are on the methodology page.

Frequently asked questions

What percentage of 4% rule retirements failed?

In our backtest of 1928-2025 US data with 75% stocks, 4 of 69 thirty-year retirements at 4% ran out, a 6% failure rate. Over 60 years, 7 of 39 start years ran out. The Trinity study found 98% success over 30 years with 75% stocks for 1926-1995[3].

What is a safe withdrawal rate for early retirement?

For a 50- or 60-year retirement, history says closer to 3.25%-3.5% than 4%. In our data the highest rate that survived every start year with 75% stocks was 3.35% over 50 years and 3.30% over 60, in line with Early Retirement Now's finding of 3.25% to 3.5%[4].

How many years does FIRE take at a 50% savings rate?

About 15.9 years from zero, if you save half of take-home pay, earn the 5.8% real return a 75/25 portfolio earned since 1928 and retire at 25 times spending. At a 25% savings rate it takes about 29.6 years.

What is the median retirement savings in the US?

$106,000 in 2025, among the 54.9% of families that had a retirement account. The mean was $451,100, pulled up by large balances[9].

Sources

Figures checked against each source on November 11, 2026.

  1. [1]Historical Returns on Stocks, Bonds and Bills: 1928-2025 · Aswath Damodaran, NYU Stern School of Business, Updated January 5, 2026.Annual S&P 500, 10-year Treasury and CPI data used by our Monte Carlo and historical backtests (S&P 500: 10.02% a year nominal, 1928-2025).
  2. [2]Determining Withdrawal Rates Using Historical Data · William P. Bengen, Journal of Financial Planning, October 1994.Origin of the 4% rule: a 4% inflation-adjusted first-year withdrawal lasted at least 33 years in every historical period tested. Used Ibbotson's 1992 SBBI data from 1926 on, illustrated with 50% common stocks and 50% intermediate-term Treasuries; a 4% first-year withdrawal, raised for inflation, never exhausted a portfolio before 33 years, while 4.25% could fail in 28 years; 3% (and about 3.5%) never lasted less than 50 years; 5% is 'risky' and 6% or more is 'gambling'; recommended 50%-75% stocks; assumed tax-deferred accounts; a 1929 retiree who cut withdrawals 5% had 20% more wealth by 1949.
  3. [3]Retirement Savings: Choosing a Withdrawal Rate That Is Sustainable (the Trinity study) · Cooley, Hubbard & Walz, AAII Journal, February 1998.30-year success rates: 4% withdrawals succeeded 95% (100% stocks), 98% (75/25) and 95% (50/50) of the time, 1926-1995; 5% succeeded 85%, 83% and 76%, and 6% succeeded 68%, 68% and 51% (Table 3). 1926-1995 data, S&P 500 for stocks and long-term high-grade corporate bonds; payout periods of 15, 20, 25 and 30 years (41 overlapping 30-year periods); success means the ending value stays above $0; no adjustment for taxes or transaction costs. Table 3 (inflation-adjusted, 30 years): 3% succeeded 100% for 100% stocks, 75/25 and 50/50; 4% succeeded 95%, 98% and 95%; 5% 85%, 83% and 76%; 6% 68%, 68% and 51%. Conclusion: for stock-dominated portfolios, 3% and 4% 'represent exceedingly conservative behavior'.
  4. [4]The Safe Withdrawal Rate Series · Karsten Jeske, Early Retirement Now, 2016-2025.The series models very long early retirements ("a 50 or even 60-year horizon"); withdrawal rates of 3.25-3.50% would have survived even the most catastrophic historical market conditions, and Part 3 argues about 3.25% is needed for low failure risk over 60 years when valuations are high.
  5. [5]Higher valuations, lower safe withdrawal rate in retirement · Morningstar, State of Retirement Income 2025, January 2026.Morningstar's 2025 safe starting withdrawal rate is 3.9% (30 years, 90% success), up from 3.7% the year before. Morningstar's base-case safe starting withdrawal rate is 3.9% for 30 years at 90% success with 30%-50% in equities, using forward-looking return and inflation assumptions; it was 3.7% the year before, 4.0% in 2023, 3.8% in 2022 and 3.3% in 2021; retirees who accept spending fluctuations can start near 6%; older retirees with shorter horizons can spend well more than 3.9%.
  6. [6]The State of Retirement Income: 2025 · Morningstar Portfolio and Planning Research (Arnott, Benz, Kephart, Guo), December 3, 2025.Base-case starting safe withdrawal rate 3.9% (fixed real withdrawals, 30 years, 90% success, forward-looking returns); flexible methods lift it, two of them to 5.7%; the Guyton-Klinger guardrails method (raise withdrawals 10% when the inflation-adjusted withdrawal rate falls 20% below its initial level, cut 10% when it rises 20% above, no cuts in the final 15 years) supported a 5.2% starting rate on a 40% equity/60% bond portfolio; its portfolio-only cash flows had a standard deviation of about 30%, roughly halved when Social Security is included; skipping inflation adjustments after a losing year makes small but cumulative, permanent cuts to real spending; spending strategies that allow higher starting rates generally bring more volatile cash flows, with the constant-percentage, endowment and RMD methods varying far more year to year; retirees seeking the highest lifetime income should consider delayed Social Security plus a flexible strategy such as guardrails; for an all-stock portfolio with fixed real withdrawals, nearly 70% of failed trials had lost value by the end of year 5, while portfolios with gains over the first five years had only about a 4% chance of later running out.
  7. [7]Guyton-Klinger guardrails: retirement income rules · Kitces.com, March 27, 2024.Guyton-Klinger rules (Tharp and Fitzpatrick): cut dollar withdrawals 10% if the withdrawal rate rises 20% above the initial rate, raise them 10% if it falls 20% below, skip the inflation adjustment when the trailing 12-month return is negative, and no guardrail cuts in the final 15 years of a plan; in Jeske's test a 1966 retiree starting at 4% saw withdrawals bottom out 59% lower; the authors argue the framework triggers cuts when they are not needed and tends to overcorrect, preserving far more capital than needed. Guyton-Klinger rules: cut dollar withdrawals 10% if the withdrawal rate rises 20% above the initial rate, raise them 10% if it falls 20% below, skip the inflation adjustment after a negative year, and no cuts in the final 15 years. In history the cuts were deep: a 1966 retiree starting at 4% cut withdrawals as low as $16,400 a year (59% below plan) and a 1965 retiree 54%; the authors propose risk-based guardrails instead.
  8. [8]Understanding sequence of return risk and safe withdrawal rates · Michael Kitces, Kitces.com, October 1, 2014.Real returns in the first decade of retirement largely determine the safe withdrawal rate (correlation about 0.79).
  9. [9]Changes in U.S. Family Finances, 2022 to 2025 (Survey of Consumer Finances) · Federal Reserve Board, October 2026.54.9% of families had retirement accounts in 2025, with a median balance of $106,000 among those who did. Table 2: median net worth in 2025 was $411,900 for families headed by someone aged 55-64 and $431,300 at 65-74; net worth counts all assets, including the primary residence, minus debts. 2025 SCF: 54.9% of families held retirement accounts (54.3% in 2022); conditional median $106,000 and mean $451,100 (2025 dollars); 65.1% of families with a head aged 64 or younger participated in a retirement plan; mean IRA/DC balances among holders by age: under 35 $48,400, 35-44 $182,400, 45-54 $415,800, 55-64 $670,200 (Box 2 Table A); median net worth $215,900 for all families and by age: under 35 $33,000, 35-44 $155,600, 45-54 $253,700, 55-64 $411,900, 65-74 $431,300, 75+ $504,900 (Table 2).
  10. [10]Consumer Expenditures, 2025 · U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, October 29, 2026.Average annual spending by all US households in 2025: $81,905. Average annual expenditures in 2025 by income quintile: lowest $37,935, second $51,405, third $68,983, fourth $92,250, highest $159,512 (Table 3). Average income before taxes for all consumer units was $110,847.
  11. [11]Consumer Expenditure Surveys, Table 1300: Age of reference person, annual expenditure means, 2025 · US Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2026.Average annual expenditures in 2025 by age of reference person: all consumer units $81,905; under 25 $54,136; 25-34 $78,579; 35-44 $93,650; 45-54 $106,658; 55-64 $85,442; 65 and older $64,445 (65-74 $69,333, 75 and older $57,959). Healthcare: $6,470 for all units, $7,317 at 55-64 and $7,986 at 65 and older. Personal insurance and pensions: $10,175 for all units, $15,075 at 45-54 and $3,550 at 65 and older. 2025 mean yearly spending, households 65+ vs all households: total $64,445 vs $81,905; shelter $13,992 vs $17,626; food $8,226 vs $10,633; transportation $10,109 vs $13,492; healthcare $7,986 vs $6,470; utilities, fuels and public services $4,680 vs $4,931; entertainment $2,975 vs $4,084; average household size 1.7 vs 2.4 people.